Spinning Cylinder Experiments

2020 - 4 - 22   Document Updated for Clarity - Dave L


In Electronic we are often given information that is not true, this is the most important one to me as what we were told hides a quality of copper medium.
When we bring a magnet up to a spinning copper cylinder it is pushed away and does not want to touch the cylinder. On released the magnet shoots across the room at high velocity.
Some have conjectured this force that pushes the magnet away is a reversed "magnetic field" emitting from the copper cylinder in motion across it's magnetic field.
They say this is a quality of "magnetism" or EM.

So we set up this experiment to use a compass inside the spinning copper cylinder to measure this "reversed magnetic field", we expected to see, and discovered, it does not exist.
The force pushing the magnet away from the spinning copper cylinder does not effect the magnets field or polarity of that field as when we bring two magnets together in opposition and two like poles repel.
There is no North South reversal of the magnets field at all as it extends through the spinning copper. It does not even matter how we orient the magnet!

The force is much stronger, then two opposing magnets can become. Seeking the answer to what this force is, takes us into the level of the Proton and the mass in motion of the copper medium.
Copper is not magnetic, it is electric, and from this experiment we discern it also has some interesting "inertial" coupling qualities. The force of the spinning mass of the copper is transferred into the magnets mass.

The two forces we can detect when we release the magnet, one is propulsion across the room at high velocity, and one is repulsion at 90 degrees to the propulsion, keeping the magnet from touching the spinning copper.
This shows us likely why the electrons in the atom do not crash into the nuclear center where the Protons and Neutrons are located, inside the "strong force" field bubble.

Further we spin up a steel cylinder and note when a magnet is brought up to it, there is only one field force noted. The steel is magnetic, and yet it does not push the magnet away or try to shoot it off at 90 degrees.
It simply pulls straight at the steel in rotation no matter how fast we make it spin. And one might realize why magnetic bearings are frictionless. There is no inertial mass coupling between them.

2005 - 8 - 27  Original Document ---------------

Physics of the Atom is Revealed

Feeling the Proton layer of the copper atom, and connecting this with a magnetic field in real life, rather then merely in theory, changed my perception of the two mediums of electronics.
Copper and Iron. When a magnetic field is moving through a copper mass like wire, the countering force or back EMF, is not magnetic, it is inertial acting on the current, as the electrons which are magnetic, try to move through the wire.
It would indeed be interesting to set up an electron gun and shoot electrons at the spinning copper cylinder and see if any of them can actually hit it, or will they be deflected off at 90 degrees as they approach it, as the magnets are.

In physics, there is a phenomena observed which is termed inertial momentum.
While it is often labeled on things like atomic orbitals, there is little understanding or "feel" of how this force operates between the Electron shell and the Proton shell in common copper wire circuits.
Where inertial momentum is transferred between two elements of a device, this is called a torsion force, or a torque.
A torsion field can be sensed by a sensitive person as this stress is being transferred during the acceleration.

The following experiment, was staged to show what happens between the proton layer [copper medium] and the electron layer [iron and magnets] with respect to motion, spin, and momentum.
Therefore it has direct application to the atomic model of the electron shell and the proton shell in all atoms.

From the two elements we can observe directly how the Electron and Proton interact with respect to motion, and magnetic field to exchange energy.
What is to be gained is how the Strong force of physics, is in fact present within this interaction operating from the deeper proton layer, which lies just inside it.
This explains also why these two materials are the root core of our electronics technology today. Induction is not what we often think.

The result of this experiment totally changed my perception of magnetism as it interacts with copper medium, and dispelled many myths taught in electronics as facts.
It was also the starting point to feeling the vibrations of the Proton layer, as is accessed in copper medium, opening the awareness to one layer deeper inside matter.

Cylinders Photo


Spinning copper cylinders 2" 3" 4" of increasing thickness. [End caps from a plumbing shop for large copper pipe, holes drilled on a lathe to fit a drill chuck perfectly.]
A magnet is brought near spinning copper cylinders [shown in the middle], then a spinning steel cylinder [shown to the right].

1- Thicker copper causes increased drag to motor

2- All magnet polarities seem to cause drag, N / S makes no difference.

3- All steel drive attachments end up magnetized with interesting polarities.

4- 1700 RPM does not increase RPM whatsoever but induces drag in every case with copper medium.
It loads the motor as we hold the magnet close to the spinning copper cylinder.

5- There is no reflected magnet reversal as the copper interacts with the magnet. At 1700 RPM, all magnets seem to extend their fields through the
copper with their flux patterns fully in tack having the same polarity.
The compass indicates as if the copper was not there and the magnetic field does not flip polarity to push the magnet away from the copper cylinder.

6- When holding a magnet by spinning steel attachments, the compass follows the magnet,
 when pulling the magnet away the attachments reverse the compass to reflect its magnetized state
opposite the magnet that magnetized it. You bring the North end of the magnet towards the steel, and when you remove it, the steel is magnetized with a South pole out.

7- Copper Cylinder side note. The magnetic field from the magnets is apparently reaching all the way inside the motor, reducing RPM
drastically if held very close to the spinning copper , as if somehow the copper in the motor is also being effected, it looses power.

In particular, note 5 above is not what I expected to see from my electronics training!
The field that opposes, a moving magnetic field in copper is not a magnetic field, but a torsion field.
A direct torque, which opposes the motion, but does not bend the magnetic flux lines at all.
This is a force related to the mass of the copper medium, it's thickness and it's velocity. These are qualities of inertia and spin, not magnetic field.

In the photo below, it does not matter how fast you spin the copper with the magnet held there,
there is no reversed magnetic field generated by the copper, and in my case the compass never even waivers with the neo magnet.
What ever force is pushing the magnet away from the spinning copper cylinder it is not a reversed magnetic field!
It is something much stronger, that can also transfer the inertial momentum of the copper to the magnet
without even bending the flux lines of the magnet in the process.
I believe it is the strong force of the atom from the proton layer
expanding outwards to stabilize the extra electron in the iron of the magnet. That was my early theory.

Compass Photo
Dave L  [experiments preformed on 08/27/05]

Applied to the atom then we can deduce, the Proton shell does not bend the flux of the magnetic field of the Electron shell.
The Proton shell, acts against the motion of the magnetic field of the electron shell directly as inertial momentum, without using the magnetic field except to align the spin.
Electron magnetic field steers the spin angle of the proton shells, and the proton shells react with an inertial coupling force that opposes the motion of the magnetic field through it.
This inertial coupling force is not magnetic at all. It's qualities are much different, and it acts to cause electrons to go into orbit around it, organizing them into shells.
This is also in agreement with NMR observations, from the MRI technology of modern medical devices. Which can be studied here.

The Basics of NMR

Transfer of energy between electron and protons layers causes angular motions and transfer of inertial momentum between the layers.

{The transfer of torsion between various elements - copper, steel, and magnets}

Spinning metals cylinder experiments:


    When a copper cylinder is held stationary inside another spinning copper or steel
    [iron] cylinder no notable forces seem to be transferred between the cylinders.

    When a magnet is brought near a spinning copper cylinder two forces are produced
    in the magnet easily felt in your hand.

        1- A repulsive force 90 deg to motion, induced by induction [felt as a cushioning force pushing the magnet away]

        2- A dragging force parallel to motion [torsion] induced from the torsional power present in the spinning cylinder being transferred to the magnet

    *No movement or shifting of magnet polarity or direction of poles has any effects on the
    two forces produced. Only area and distance between copper and magnet seem to have
    an effect.

    *The presence of a compass shows no alternate magnetic fields produced and no
    alteration or bending of the magnets lines of flux. The flux seems to move through
    the copper, whether spinning or not, unrestricted and unbent. During spinning there
    is no trailing magnetic field in the copper detectable strong enough to account for
    the parallel force, or strong enough to move the needle of the compass in the slightest.

    *The presence of another stationary copper layer between the magnet and the spinning
    copper cylinder is invisible to the process and neither blocks the effect or produces
    any dragging to the stationary copper. There is no linking of torsion between the
    copper layers, only from the moving copper to the magnet.

Steel [iron]

    When a magnet is brought near a spinning steel cylinder only one force seems present

        1- An attraction towards the center of the steel mass [independent of RPM]

        2- No dragging force seems to be present as with the copper [torsion is absent]

    *The steel is also quickly magnetized by this effect with a south outwards
    or aiding magnetic field. This is easily observed with a compass during the
    interaction. Lines of magnetic flux are bent and distorted by the steel but
    no torsion transfer is present.

    If a magnet is hung from the ceiling down near the steel cylinder, no matter the speed of revolution the magnet will not move in the slightest to the side.
    It continues to pull directly to the center of the steel cylinder, no matter how fast the steel cylinder is spun up.

Two cylinder experiments:

Copper and Steel

    When magnets are placed on a spinning copper cylinder and brought inside a steel
    cylinder [on a free turning axis from the opposite direction], the iron cylinder
    does not spin up in the slightest.

        1- An attraction force is present [magnetic] as shown with magnets earlier
        2- No [torsion] is transferred between the cylinders

    When magnets are placed on a spinning steel cylinder brought inside a free turning
    copper cylinder, the copper cylinder quickly spins up.

        1- [Torsion] is transferred from magnets to copper or copper to magnets

        2- Also the iron does not seem to lower the reach of the magnets as was expected
        they "sink in" easily at 1/4 to 1/2 inch and transfer the torsion to the copper cylinder.

    Copper seems to have a quality missing in iron, the ability to
    transfer force [torsion] through an established magnetic field into the magnet.
    This torsion is not dependent on magnet pole positioning and works equally
    for all magnet positions.

    Copper seems to transfer its "momentum" through the magnetic field,
    linking it or sinking it into the magnet. Iron does not. Copper has a special quality.
    [Momentum or torsion transfer].

    This may be why copper is listed as a favorable AG material.
    Also why iron is not present on the list.

Spinning magnet experiments:

    To see whether the torsional force transferred from spinning copper is dependent on which
    material is in movement [spinning]. It is now necessary to spin the magnets on an ABS
    plastic material then place the copper cylinder inside it.

    This experiment shows that the copper is now pulled along with the magnets.
    The [torsion] or [momentum] is transferred from the spinning magnets to the copper.

Centering force:

    Also it is noted that the [centering force] is very present and does stabilize the
    copper cylinder inside the spinning magnets quite well at 1700 RPM providing a cushioning


    Whether the parallel force between copper and magnets in motion is due to shifting the
    magnetic field backwards in time [Tesla] in the material in motion [offsetting the repulsive
    magnetic force], or due to a transfer of [torsion] across the magnetic field is still an
    unknown. I feel it is unlikely that a trailing magnetic field in the copper is responsible
    as a compass does not shift in the least due to any copper interactions.
    Because I have not been able to perceive a shift in the magnetic field,
    the most likely true statement is this:


    Spinning copper transfers its [torsion] or [momentum] into a magnet when its magnetic field
    sinks into it, irregardless of magnetic polarity. Spinning iron or steel do not.
    Spinning magnets transfer their [momentum] or [torsion] into copper held in close proximity
    as well. Direction of torsion transfer moves from higher to lower energy, either
    direction, but maintains its direction parallel to the force that induces it.


Summary Comment:

    Current teachings:

    The results observed do not seem to follow my current simple understanding of
    electric and magnetic fields with respect to copper, electron flow, motion, and polarity
    of magnetic fields. It is interesting to find a force being transferred that is not
    subject to magnet polarity or angle, attributed to electron interaction of [induction]
    which is stated to operate at only 90 degrees to such magnetic and electric fields.

    The resultant force does not seem to weaken or bend the flux of the magnet as
    indicated by a compass using copper.
    If the parallel movement was due to electromagnetic fields, how could a magnet
    push against itself as claimed with reverse induction? How could a reflected magnet
    from the copper push at 90 degrees to opposing magnet polarity?
    Why would it push towards the coppers motion?

    Torsion transfer:
    It is more likely that another force is present with [copper] yet to be explained,
    that current electrical theory has not covered very well [torsion transfer].
    If this [torsion transfer] can be reversed to aid spin, then the reported
    acceleration of ZPE devices could be understood and a new motive force
    available for power generation.

    This is an exciting observation because [torsion] has been identified to be one dimension
    of the [gravity torsion] field. It is the field emitting from the Aether which shows elastic
    qualities and therefore to be the one field that can be altered, stretched or compressed,
    that may also affect the gravity field at right angles to it.

    As to electric motors:

    Also noteworthy is the realization that in an electric motor, any copper in motion
    inside a magnetic field, if left de-energized, will become a heavy drag to motion.
    This would seem to indicate that motors could be improved by adding cycles
    of opposing magnetic force when moving away from the field that attracted them,
    and never left in a state of being not energized. Motors could be developed that
    reverse the current direction as the rotor winding passes the field winding,
    rather then simply de-energizing them. This should reduce copper losses as
    well as heat losses and improve motor efficiency.

Notes on metals:


    -Does not bend a magnetic field or effect the lines of flux in any perceivable way

    -Transfers its torsion in the presence of a moving magnetic field sunk into it

    -If locked motionless, resists the motion of the matter that created the moving
     magnetic field without regard to positioning of magnetic poles

    -If shaped into wire and held motionless, transfers a moving magnetic field
    into a varying electric field at 90 degrees to motion of the magnetic field

Iron or steel surface:

    -Bends and distorts a magnetic field altering lines of flux

    -Does not transfer its torsion in the presence of a moving magnetic field

    -If locked motionless, does not resist the motion of the matter that created the
    moving magnetic field but merely attracts all magnetic poles equally towards
    it's center of mass.

    AG = abbrev Anti gravity
         [Crandall lists copper, aluminum, bismuth and
           element 115 as favorable anti gravity materials]


It would seem Electronics techs have not been accurately informed, of a force present in electronics, which is 137 times more powerful then the magnetic field.
Namely the Strong Force found operating from the Proton shell inwards in physics.
This force has different qualities, which may not be apparent to an electronics engineer or technician. It operates from a spherical base to organize electric fields from a center of spin, or a center of torque.
It has ability to interact or to react to a moving magnetic field with 137 times the reflective power, and also to couple inertial forces between copper and iron elements.

These inertial fields are capable of transferring enough energy to hurl a magnet across the room at high velocity and smash it into the wall.
This is far more power then any two magnets can generate from their poles alone in repelling opposition.
Repelling poles of a magnetic field from iron, actually decouple this torsion force, and can be used to create magnetic bearings which are frictionless and will not transfer torque at all.
The copper generates a repelling force that couples the inertial spin also, and does not even bend the magnetic flux in the process.

This new force which must be recognized operating in copper and iron circuits, is also the same force we open up in Vibrational Cell and Tube Device work.
It has been referred to as Radiant Energy.

A Joe Cell can move a compass at much longer distances then any magnet can be expected to reach out.

Joe Cell Menu

End Original Document ----------------

Dropping a Magnet Through a Copper Medium

2020 - 4 - 22   Dave L
This experiment is not what you may think going in, surprising results.

Photo Copper Pipe and Large Coil

Some Items of Copper are arranged so that a large Neo magnet can be dropped down through them. The magnet is seen in the lower left corner of the photo above.
We have a large copper pipe on the left of the photo. A 5000 foot plus coil of 24 Gauge wire on a plastic spool with the holes widened so the copper pipe will fit inside it, and another short copper pipe that can be dropped through the energized coil.

First we drop the magnet through the large copper pipe and note it takes a few seconds to fall slowly down through it. From our experiments above we realize the magnet will receive the coppers mass momentum, in this case to "set still" and resist falling. No problem, so what we expected to see. We turn the magnet sideways 90 degrees and drop it through again, no effect, it still falls just as slowly no matter how we orient the poles of the magnet.

Next we drop the magnet through the coil of wire which has about 4 or 5 times the weight of the copper tube and is wound all the way from the center tube that is very close to the hole. It free falls, with no resistance to falling! For me that was unexpected. We try configuring the wires in various ways, shorting them, reversing them, etc, it has no effect and we cannot get the magnet to fall slower through the wire coil at all, then a free fall acceleration.

Next we energize the coil with 12 vdc testing this field using various iron things like paper clips, nails, and the magnet itself, and we find it has a pretty strong field especially at the poles.
We now drop the smaller copper pipe through it's magnetic field. It free falls also with no resistance to falling! This also was unexpected, as we tend to think of the magnetic field from a coil as the same as from a magnet. It is apparently not. This magnetic field being generated from a current in the copper wire does not effect the copper medium falling through it, to slow it's fall. It does not couple the inertial field between the two elements. Yet we have seen that with a real magnet falling though a solid copper mass it does have an inertial coupling effect.

Copper wire, whether energized or not, does not seem to effect the inertial coupling of other copper. What ever is happening between copper and iron, is happening at some level of dimension we are not able to see right off.

Pondering the Results

Pondering that the effects we are working with in these experiments are inertial effects coming from the mass or weight of the copper and this is located within the isotope of the copper where nearly all the mass of the atom is found.
Coppers Isotope or Proton spin field is coherent and locked into the mass of the nucleus of the atom, and it aligns itself down the longest dimension of the copper. In other words all the Isotopes in the copper form a coherent spin field or vibration field. In the wire this is turned 90 degrees to the path of the magnet falling through it and it seems to offer no coupling to the mass inertia between the two elements.

In the upright pipe the spin of the Isotopes all aligns itself to the longest dimension of the tube and runs in the same direction as the path of the magnet falling through it.
To prove this theory we would have to cipher how to turn the Isotope field to 90 degrees in the long pipe and see if the magnet will fall through it at a free fall speed as it does in the wire coil.
This experiment yet to be achieved, as some calculations are in order to achieve that.

I would also add that if you are standing on a positive charge plate and get hit with a negative bolt of arcing energy it will burn you.
If you are standing on a negative charge plate and get hit by a positive bolt of electricity, you will get hurled through the air and not burned.
The power of mass inertia, is coupled to the proton layer, the positive charge, and this is the Isotope location of the atom where all the mass is.
Copper appears to be an electric element coupled to the positive charge of the atom as dominant.

Palming Coppers Coherent Isotope Field

Diagram Sensing Copper Pipe

Isotope fields generally form with a 30 degree tip angle, when raise up as larger fractals from the nuclear level. Copper already has one present.

See the document on Stainless Steel Tube Polarization in the Joe Cell section.  Stainless Steel Tube Polarization
In Joe Cell work we learned to palm the fields around stainless steel pipes. It was discovered they do have a similar field to copper but the angle of the cone is at 90 degrees at the tip of the cone.
So now here I am palming the node points of the field on the copper pipe and discover it has a familiar Isotope shape at a steeper angle off the top. The node in the air is much higher.
Note also as this field moves down the pipe the cones reverse to form nodal points all the way down moving in then out again to 1 diameter away from the pipe, then right up to the metal surface.

I stick the magnet inside the pipe anywhere top or bottom and the tip of the cone drops to the 90 degree angle with 45 degree angles off the end converging above the pipe.
The cones all compress on the Isotope chain, when the magnet is present. I hold the magnet up to the side of the pipe and the same thing happens, all the cones compress.
This means that on the vertical pipe, all the Isotopes in the copper are responding to the magnet being held anywhere up close to it, and at any orientation of the poles.

As I drop the magnet down through the pipe, the cones do not change, they are compressed anytime the magnet is near the pipe, and all of them on the entire pipe change together, because they are a coherent field effect.
Basically the cones we see mapped here in the air are a larger fractal dimension of the Isotope cones inside the atoms of the copper all lining up in the same direction and forming a larger field, of the same geometry.
This is very similar to how magnets operate on the electron shell. All the little domains inside the iron line up to generate one large magnetic field of the same form as all the little ones have, the torus field.

I can now with relative certainty, state that copper is a coherent Isotope field, of positive charge form at the atomic level of the copper atom, as magnetized Iron is a coherent electron field.
The main difference in these two is the fact that the Proton shell of the Isotope lies inside the strong force area of the atom, and thus will have its reactive qualities at greater power levels then the magnetic field that lies outside the strong force area.
The strong force field of the atom carries the inertial mass qualities of the positive charge.When a magnet is brought near, the spin angle of the cones in the copper Isotope field widen and compress inwards along their height.

It took a lot of Joe Cell work to get to this point, some 15 years after this initial document was written.
What can we now do with this understanding?

Ciphering the Dynamic - Iron to Copper- Copper to Iron

How does this interaction between Copper and Iron work?
NMR study gives us the answers. Iron has a very low abundance, meaning that most all of it's atoms do not have an Isotope magnetic field large enough to be hooked. They can only form into a coherent field by using vibration frequency.
Iron has a magnetic electron shell however and can be magnetized on that level.
Copper has a neutral magnetic field on the Electron shell unless current is flowing through it. Copper also has a strong nuclear magnetic charge that can be hooked into for NMR work using a magnetic field to align it.

Ok the magnetic field of the Iron hits the copper, taking control of the Copper Isotopes conical shape, changing its frequency which is the height of the cone, as a magnetic field to nuclear spin alignment field coherence.
Copper then turns around generating a large coherent conical spin field around the iron, and takes control of it's nuclear spin alignment using vibration.
When the two mass fields of both elements come into a field coherence, they exchange inertial charge, and try to maintain similar velocities through space as one mass.
The coppers strong force however attempts to hold the magnetic field of the iron at specific distance out from it, as it does inside the atoms electrons at smaller fractal dimension inside it's own atoms.

Now with this mental model we realize we cannot interfere with the magnetic field, but we can interfere with the vibration field in various ways if we can determine it's frequency.

Mapping the Vibration Matrix Of the Radiant Field Around the Copper Pipe

Matrix Map Around Copper Pipe

In order to get a measurement of the Cones frequency, we must determine it's height from center of base to tip. This is from work with cones raised from the Isotope field of the Gold Element.  Conical Field Menu
We can measure it without the magnet, and then with the magnet, remembering that Copper has two Isotopes at different frequencies.
In the photo above I have done some work with the tube again to fully map more of the cones matrix around the tube. These cones also run up and down the inside of the tube as we see at the upper end.
I believe we can assume that the distances are the same inside and outside the copper mass.
This is the field the magnet is falling through and disturbing. It is a basic NMR field, that changes frequency with the presence of a magnetic field.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

For any element having an odd number of either Protons or Neutrons, the Nuclear bundle [ Isotope ] will have a value of "Spin" which is accessible from outside the atom using a magnetic field to manipulate it. Iron has an even number of 26 Protons, Copper has an odd number of 29 Protons. This is the basis of NMR technology, and from about 1944 onwards humans have been studying this effect using basically EM instruments. They realized two things, the atoms spin field could be manipulated using either magnetic pulses, or nearby atoms could also align them.

Atoms such as Copper and Chromium can be manipulated in this way. In my work I have discovered these are the source of the Radiant Energy fields we use in Joe Cells and alternate energy devices, as well as Crandle claimed are the Anti gravity metals.
ABCH Aluminum Bismuth Copper Hydrogen. They all have some diamagnetic qualities, that is amplified with motion or vibration. Motion is the third field force of Wilbert Smiths Descriptions, it is a Field of Vibration, known to NMR science, but not usually discussed in Electronics technology. It is referred to in physics as "Nuclear Spin" or "Isotope Spin" and the frequencies are known to vary with the applied magnetic field strength of the magnet.

The Nuclear mass vibration can travel all the way through copper wire end to end, and Tesla called it the T field. As we are starting to see now, it can change the angle of the nuclear "spin cone" all the way down the wire from a magnetic field applied anywhere along the wire. T waves were clocked by Tesla and travel at pi/2 times the speed of light. Because copper and aluminum have natural field coherence at this level, they were used by Tesla in his self powering energy devices.

As many other sensitives can feel these vibration frequencies, as more scientists take note, realization that we can use a simple caliper to measure them will become more mainstream.
 This should not be hidden anymore from the public, as to how we are tapping into Nuclear power without destruction of the atoms. In Copper we now see this field is all around it to the diameter distance outwards of the pipe, in the form of a circular pipe which is shaped well to bring up this field for personal examination.
I had my wife hold her finger over the tube and come down on it, and she could feel these energy nodes. She is not very sensitive to vibration but could feel these ones.

We now seem to be making the connection between feel felt work and actual recorded science.
I have known about this for many years but never really could show it to this degree, where it is now nearly impossible to argue with. Many have argued with me on this subject, and I know without being able to feel it, it is not self evident.
In spite of not being able to measure a reversed magnetic field, they would still claim it was a magnetic field repelling the magnet from the spinning copper cylinder. From Wilbert Smiths descriptions of what a magnetic field is, I realized that could not be the case. Now I can map and measure the field directly using SS calipers, some 15 years after having theorized it in the early experiments.

Why does the magnet free fall through the copper wire coil with 4 to 5 times the mass of the copper tube?

The very thin wires of the coil are surrounded by dielectric insulation, and the Isotope fields cannot reach between the wraps to form a coherent Isotope field larger then the magnet.
The inertial charge on each wire does not couple to the magnets atoms, as it does when falling through the solid copper pipe with the very large coherent Isotope field on it.

Now when we drop the copper tube through the energized coil, it does change the angle of the large Isotope field on the copper tube, but they are not transferred as inertial fields into the coil, because the wire is not made of Iron.
While Copper and Iron lay very close to one another on the table of the elements, the Neutron Proton structure is very different between them.

If we make a coil having a 2 layered core, the center core is iron with a copper tube around it, the inductive kickback on this coil is tremendously strong. What we would call back emf, or cemf [ counter electro motive force ], increases geometrically.
This is because when the large scale isotope field forms it is geometrically larger in all it's dimensions. When it collapses back to normal, it also torques the irons mass field. Wire coils produce the same, but the field is so small it does not amplify much over what goes in.

Alternate Energy Systems

John Bidini had spent most of his life trying to cipher this and collect the "Radiant energy" from copper circuits to generate more energy out then you put in. Possibly if he had known about the coherent Isotope field effect, he may have succeeded with much simpler circuits, using geometry to amplify the kickback, or inductive field return. The one test I monitored using a copper tube over the iron core, blew out the driver transistors very fast at the end of the driver pulse. So much voltage came back from the reversed polarity kick, it passed backwards through the driver transistors and burned them out instantly. Possibly a diac or zenner could have been installed to divert the peak voltages around the drivers, into a storage cap, and used to power the circuit also??? Or some such configuration. Another concept was to run iron wire through the center of the large coil with both copper and iron core, then loop the iron wires through a small coil with only the iron and no copper tube but placed outside the field of 1 diameter of the large coil. Drive the system from the small coil, and see if the counter emf stays in the large coil as the copper does not move between them. The key to this is finding the correct geometry so the change in the dimensions of the copper Isotope field starts to power the circuit. When you realize that copper mass has an isotope field that is nuclear sourced in power, your mental models begin to change on how to tap into that energy.

Other investigation can be done on copper coils on iron cores where another layer of wire is wound around the first at 90 degrees to it, to see if the isotope field can be strengthened with wires running parallel to the iron core, whether they are in the circuit or not in the circuit.

We have not yet even begun to change the isotope fields dimensions using vibration frequencies, which would be my personal choice if possible. This requires someone who can measure the coppers field, and then begin a study to quantify the effects.
With vibration effects we can use ratios to set up vibrations that self power, as with the pi/2 ratio, and if the Isotope fields change dimension so as to induce electrical currents, we would have a free energy system.

Back to Magnetism Site