# Over Unity in the Flywheel

It would seem that mankind has already found two methods of gaining Over unity energy in orbital systems.
In the one case we have a sling shot orbital maneuver, the second in the mass of a rotating wheel being pulsed under powered acceleration.

This sheds much light on both the Searl disc and the Utron as both use pulsing magnetic drag to generate over unity. Searl disc has a system of 12 minimum angles of the wheel using opposing magnets, and the Utron uses a magnetic pulse against an inductive metal on a fast spinning wheel or conical wheel.

The following are a few of my own thoughts on why this may happen.

## Centrepital and Centrifugal forces in a spinning wheel

When we look at a spinning wheel we find present a scalar canceling pair of forces in balance. Centrifugal force [C]  is acting strongest on the nuclear mass where the weight is the largest factor of the atoms. Centrepital force [c] is pulling inwards and due to the stress held in the electron shells of the atoms of the wheel, binding the weight towards the center and fully resisting the outwards thrust of the Nuclear mass.

These are not fully locked together but there is in fact a motional interaction between them at the nuclear level. The two countering forces are bound in different parts of the atoms structure.
Thus in the case of an impulse alteration of forwards or reverse momentum of the wheel, both forces may be seen as separate and thus treated separately during vector addition, and then summed. This is of coarse more true for a faster pulse timing due to the short distances inside atoms.

We must first recognize that in a "sling shot" or a rock twirling system, if we put a small amount of accelerating energy into the final turn, the rock gains over unity energy. Similarly if we place drag here the rock will nearly stop. The sling shot orbital maneuver relies on acceleration being placed on the system at 90 degrees to the countering balanced forces. Setting these two forces off balance we discover that each force in itself will add energy to the velocity of the rock. While they are not being deflected they are fully canceling, but since they both operate in reverse, as they are set off centered, the vector result is that both will effect the velocity the same direction.

Alternate energy research teaches us to observe that when opposing forces meet they do not cancel. Even though a net zero energy may be present, both forces are still very much present.  You cannot just add them together get zero and then forget about them for the offset force interaction. Thus a 90 degree force redirecting both will be shifting this higher energy off centered on two sides of the balance, and now each side must be observed before summing the result.

Resulting force is the sum of all the vectors of acceleration present. The red lines are after the first step of this process where we add each opposing force one at a time to the offset force at 90 degrees to find the resultant equivalent vector of energy. This means that the resulting offset force will be the sum of both resulting forces. If the two are equal then there is a doubling of the deflected energy. The vector tangent to the wheel must have its length doubled. As long as this vector model is true, the circle will be in an over unity state, drawing energy from the time domain [higher density compression area] and placing it into the motional vector of the wheel.

## Atoms

Bringing energy up out of the nuclear mass is the description for the Hamel cones, if the nuclear vibrations can be coaxed outwards we get additional energy from the atoms internal spin momentum.
It has been surmised that as the wheel spins over time the nucleus of the atom will slowly come into alignment with this spin, and begin to store it, as well as align some of its own natural spin momentum with the new angular momentum of the wheel.

A compressing force causes the nucleus of the atoms to be pushed against the electron shell and alters the c velocity of angular momentum inside the atoms. Between these two shells all is EM and nuclear mass is floating, yet the major weight of an atom is at the nucleus and not the electron shell. As we add acceleration to the wheel this angle of highest compression between the atomic shells is altered tilting the vectors of force accordingly.

The above chart shows at the circumference of the wheel, the compression forces between Electron shells and nuclear mass change there alignment. As the nucleus rolls forwards its pressure against the electron shell may impart additional spin from the nucleus of the atom to the outer bonding structure of the wheel. The area of highest compression tilts its vector angle from C alignment towards wheel motion and imparts energy between these three vectors. Energy from C stored in the nuclear mass is imparted against b and finally deflects c accordingly.

The resultant of these two is actually about a 45 outwards, as the second diagram shows a full 90 degree force which it would only reach if coming to a complete stop and C disappeared. The nuclear mass will rock back and forth front to back as the wheel is pulsed somewhere between probably about 45 degrees either way. As we have seen previously the 45 degree angle is torsions natural path for sensing torsion fields.  Just how the nucleus will impart additional energy to the wheel is obviously not clear at this time.

Irregardless of the reason for the energy gain from pulsing a wheels forwards momentum under power it has been shown to create OU. This is no small discovery!

In a wheel the important functions are mass of the wheel [ mostly along its outer circumference], wheel velocity, and acceleration of the wheel or pulsing power.
The wheel must be pulsed under power to give the energy gain, just as a sling shot on the last turn before release, now a sharp release for an instant or a reverse impulse, the compression angle between nuclear mass and electron structure will shift radically over the top and forwards crashing into the electron shell in the direction of motion of the wheel.

## Concepts gained from this study:

1 - A spinning flywheel can offer OU energy if pulsed. The loop can be closed from motor to generator!

2 - The energy comes from the nuclear mass and off balancing of the forces comparable to gravity and Centrepital, for
a sling shot orbit. In the case of a wheel however gravity may not be the main source of the energy but opposing or
scalar canceling forces of centrifugal and Centrepital forces deflected. This system should work where there is no gravity or
also if the wheel is running horizontal to gravity although possibly not as well.

3 - Pulsing would best not drop below forwards power draw. If driving torque is dropped completely, then the vectors
may reverse and loose energy rather then draw it from the time domain. The best setup may not be a pulsing
drive motor, but two motors set in conflict. The first motor provides a constant forwards drive, the second motor
pulses in reverse with very short duty cycle pulses not strong enough to fully counter the first motor so the
forwards vector never drops away. The two forces meet on the flywheel shaft.

4- The drive motor must always be accelerating the wheel so never fully comes up to the full speed it could impart if
allowed to run free.

5- Opposing magnets set up correctly around the circumference could offer both sharp pulse drag, and higher
opposing force to increase the output of the system. Duty cycle on this ring would become the control. Shift
the dragging past 50 percent and we gain control of the wheel backing it off. This can be done with
electromagnets, or a weak pulsed motor in opposition.

6- RPM needs to exceed gravity probably, and C may be well over 32 feet per second squared at the outer circumference of the flywheel, other wise nuclear mass will remain restricted to the lower areas of the atoms.

7 - Pulse rate should be as high as possible. Setting up oscillations in the flywheels velocity can become quite invisible to an observer at OU speeds.

This information should be useful to any flywheel system seeking more out then goes in.

## References

Documentation on Chas Campbells Flywheel device  Patrick Kelly

Studies on Physical wheels and acceleration  David Lowrance

Overunity.com studies Chas Campbells flywheels

"Tsing Hua University in China worked with an old Chinese Inventor and had a video taken on January 4, 1996.  That invention could magnify Input Electricity 30 times and had been used in a factory environment for over 11 years."

Home