Magnetism has been studied for centuries and almost from the beginning seemingly wild claims as to its importance have been stated. As I too have now studied magnetism it becomes much more obvious that as the 2nd most powerful force we have discovered, these claims may not be so inaccurate. My studies have led me all the way into quantum physics at the smallest measurable places where this force is detected. My surprise is what Leedskin and many of the others have been pointing towards, that magnetism is actually two forces working in harmony. More specifically four forces. It may very well be that in the splitting of these magnetic flows lies the [Source] of free energy.
Engineering magnetism at the atomic level is the only piece we are missing at present. The needed mathematical relationships must be converted to useful formulas to accomplish this for each device considered.
At the roots of magnetism, within the atom, we discover 4 different sources which can result in a magnetic flow external to the atom itself. Magnetism is a force linked to 4 separate forms of spin at the atomic level.
1 - Proton Particle Spin [42.5781 Mhz / Tesla] NMR
2 - Proton Orbital Spin [around 2 Mhz / Tesla] NMR
3 - Electron Particle Spin [28.025 Ghz / Tesla] ESR [Reversed component from Proton]
4 - Electron Orbital Spin [around 12 Ghz / Tesla] ESR
The 4 types of spin are all very different and distinct. In the normal magnetic field all these spins are setting in alignment and create basically one polarized magnetic field, in which the Proton is the dominant force in weight [mass is 1836 times higher]. However the Electron has a magnetic moment around 658.2106881 times the Proton. In a coherent magnetic field with both a Proton and an Electron it should be noted that the electron is spinning the opposite direction of the Proton. It's particle momentum is reversed from its magnetic field. When combined within a Neutron this becomes important, as well as establishing an orbital repulsion.
In the non magnetized atoms these spins are distributed such that none align consistently as they orbit the atom. In the atoms of Iron Cobalt and Nickel these spins come into alignment enough to create a coherent flow. In Iron the Electron shell is magnetic and the Nucleus is not. In Cobalt both are magnetic. In Copper only the Proton shell is magnetized and the Electron shell is not.
As an atomic particle spins, its motion contains two different yet linked spin properties.
Angular momentum [the spin of mass]
Magnetic moment [the magnetic field]
The method in which atomic particles interact is through the charge of the particle, the magnetic field , spin coupling, and the strong force.
This is the force operating inside the Nucleus area of the atom which effects gravity. It is 137 times stronger then the Electromagnetic forces, and manifests a strong attraction or sucking inwards of the Nuclear particles. The periodic table shows us that all the parts within the nucleus weigh more when removed [compare atomic weight to Proton Neutron Electron counts]. The Nucleus is converting mass to energy.
These are the forces that we have to work with for engineering AG and ZPE devices. Mainly the first three can be used in device designs but it is probably the last one that we need to reach into for a mass into energy effect.
Angular momentum [spin of mass] is linked to the mass or weight of a particle and determines the particles power to effect other matter. However it is only through the EM or magnetic field that this energy can be transferred beyond the Proton layer. The magnetic field is the agent by which the momentum is transferred. Each of the particles involved has a "charge," as well as a "magnetic precession of spin." The Proton has 1836 times the mass of the electron, but exactly the same size charge, only positive rather than negative.
Proton charge e = 1.602 x 10 ^ -19 coulombs
Electron charge -e = -1.602 x 10 ^ -19 coulombs
The motion of [particle] spin is how the charge becomes two of the magnetic fields.
Protons magnetic dipoles precess around 42.5781 Mhz / Tesla
Electrons magnetic dipoles precess around 28.025 Ghz / Tesla
The motion of [Orbital] spin is the other method. Magnetic dipole precessional frequency ranges were mentioned previously for the other two fields.
Its [electrical charge] is seen to reach out as an inverse distance squared force. This force is divergent in all directions.
Its [magnetic field] is seen to reach out as an inverse distance cubed force. This is a raw force of dipole magnetism independent of frequency of precession. It is caused by the electron traversing a circle at .999999... the speed of light, and spinning a reverse direction, as it does. The Proton doing similar yet with a like direction of spin as orbit.
Its [RF field] is seen to absorb and radiate photons at its NMR or ESR frequency as a little point source of RF or microwave energy. This is a link between magnetisms dipole [precession frequency] and the photons frequency.
This interaction has the capacity to flip the dipole completely over increasing its energy by placing the magnetic moment in opposition, and the angular momentum in an aiding state with all opposite particles in the field. The only way that both magnetic polarized states could be stable is if there are a combination of 4 forces, 1 is always in opposition to the other 3. The forces at work here are magnetic polarity of the Proton in its orbital, magnetic polarity of the Electron in its orbital, Proton angular momentum, and Electron angular momentum.
Because the RF frequency is a function of the surrounding magnetic field strength, the particles may interact across a wide band of RF EM spectrum. That of electrons, reaching far in excess of there natural microwave range as well as far below, if they are removed from the atom as with an electric arc.
The Proton is seen as a magnetic dipole spinning 1 Mhz to 400 Mhz. Protons are seen as heavy or massive particles compared with Electrons. The Protons orbital motions are seen spewing out Mhz frequencies depending on the atoms they are inside which lay ~1000 times lower in frequency then the Electrons. The Protons g-Factor is seen at 5.5, meaning when Protons orbital and particle motion are combined the resulting magnetic moment is 5.5 times stronger then either alone. This brings the Protons magnetic moment up by a factor of five to around [7.878 ·10-26 J/T]. The Protons particle and Orbital motions fall in the same direction. The 2 magnetic fields generated from these two motions are coupled at the atomic level, and normally no external fields ever enter the atom strong enough to realign or break the coupling apart. They are seen as one complex motion magnetically in alignment, the result of two different spin frequencies, both in the Mhz region. Thus if we tilt the orbital field we also tilt the particle field.
The Electron is seen spinning in the 28 Ghz region. Thats about 1000 times faster then the Proton. Its mass or weight is seen as very small compared to Protons [mp / me = 1836.152701] , yet the net electric charge is identical only reversed in value. The Electrons g-Factor is about 2, meaning that when its orbital and particle spins are coupled they add up to twice the magnetic moment [ -1856.9 ·10-26 J/T]. These two spins are magnetically coupled as well and would both tilt together if suspended in a gas form. However in solid or liquid forms, electron orbits are fairly stationary forming bonds with other atoms.
Magnetic Moment - Electron / Proton - Ratio: Ue / Up = 658.2106881
Mass - Proton / Electron - Ratio: 1836.152
The Electrons particle spin is seen in reverse of its orbital spin however, and this presents a very special case for a particle creating a magnetic field. The two magnetic fields are seen one winding around inside the other in reverse direction such that the particles momentum ends up reversed of its magnetic moment. This creates the particle of opposite effects when coupling to the Protons magnetic field. Electron particle spin is reversed of Proton particle spin if both are in the same magnetic field.
In a magnet these 4 spins all fall into alignment because over all they effect one another and loosely couple to one another orbitally yet tightly couple within particle orbital paths of each one. There are two kinds of magnetic alignment between these particles, and within NMR studies we see the differences. An orbital spin that receives excess energy through photon absorption, takes a spiral path and flips its motion completely over, reversing its N / S polarity. Normally when orbital spin flips, particle spin does also as the two are coupled together. To cause these two spins to decouple takes a very strong magnetic field far in excess of anything we could hope to accomplish in our garage. The energy is lowest when the magnetic moment is aligned with the external magnetic field.
So here we see a picture where the Nucleus is hanging suspended inside the Electron shell attracted by charge and repelled in a cushion of magnetism, and coupled by spin through the magnetic field. The Nucleus a large mass with a small magnetic coupling, free to be flipped around by external magnetic fields which effect the momentum of the atom the greatest. As the electron orbitals are normally locked in place by chemical bonding or crystal structure, after magnetization they are pretty solid. Held in place by a much stronger magnetic force and far less actual mass.
As particles communicate through ESR and NMR they do so between "like" particles. Electrons may send photons that will not interact with Protons and also the reverse is true, yet each will exchange photon energy with their neighbors. Electron and Proton magnetic fields will tend to precess around the same vector, only flipping there alignment between two stable states. In both alignments 1 force of the 4 is always acting in opposition. An atom with a high nuclear spin will function very well at spreading NMR between atoms, as will a paramagnetic atom will with ESR.
If we spin the copper nucleus magnetically, we get a physical torque. If we increase the frequency of magnetic spin so it hits the NMR frequency or a lower harmonic, which is the natural mass vibration rate, we may see a point where the nucleus begins to add energy to the momentum from its normal spiraling flipping motion. Coupling photon absorbed energy into physical spin.
[The 90 degree tilt, reaching a new stable state between Proton and Electron fields, Quadrature magnetization.]
If we succeed at creating two magnetic fields setting at 90 degrees to one another where Protons align to precess around one, and Electrons align around the other, we could expect magnets to saturate along these two 90 degree angles as more atoms take on this alignment forming longer chains. We could also expect that the transmition of ESR and NMR energies would become polarized along such a 90 degree relationship as photons jump between atoms. Further the hint from the Searl disk that high voltages may accompany each field of the polarity following the particle generating the field. When the forces of EM no longer cancel within atoms and begin to appear at the edges of the material, we can expect a lot of energy to become present.
State one: [The low energy state]
The magnetic moments are aligned - The angular momentum is opposing
State Two: [The high energy state]
The magnetic moment is opposing - The angular momentum is aligned
Either state sets at least one force in opposition to the other three.
Once the electron shell is bonded into a solid, the Proton field normally takes on one of these two states, precessing around it, unless a higher magnetic field becomes present at another angle moving through it.
One possible method [cobalt magnets]:
Since the Electrons 2 magnetic fields are usually fairly locked in during magnetization in a permanent magnet, if we position part of it horizontally and part vertically, then as we add momentum to the disc our Protons in the horizontal plane will want to align vertically. If we then coax them using another slightly weaker magnet at 90 degrees [vertical], they should tilt vertical and begin to precess around it, at some RPM where the momentum of the Proton begins to exceed its weaker magnetic holding force. This static state where both particles are at 90 degree magnetization is the one that may begin to cause relativistic alterations at the Neutron layer. This could be as simple as two magnets carefully aligned on both sides of a cylinder wall. At some critical velocity the field would split in the horizontally polarized magnet.
Another method of causing momentum in a magnetic disc:
If we simply place many stronger magnets at 90 degrees with moving intersecting fields such that we cause the Protons to all spin one direction along many points around the cylinder, we are effectively creating small rotating gyros. As we spin them through a 90 degree spin to the cylinders outer surface they will all impart a momentum to turn the disc. This is possible because nearly all the mass of an atom is in the nucleus, and it is the nucleus that will be spinning. You can show this principle by holding a fast turning bicycle wheel on its axis, while setting on a swivel chair. As you roll the wheel one direction in front of you, perpendicular to spin, one hand moves up as the other moves down, your chair will start to turn. While this method should be able to start a disc into motion it will not split the fields totally unless it spins them at 90 degrees to the primary magnetic field, yet it will create a small time interval where blotch walls pass at 90 degrees which may cause a smaller effect, but certainly not a complete saturation. This would appear however to be a rotating magnetic field at the nuclear level.
In a non magnetic solid material the electron orbitals are locked by chemical bonding and crystalline structures, however they are not magnetic. A material like Aluminum or Copper will need to be magnetized along its electron orbitals by passing a steady current through them one direction or laying them next to magnetized materials, if we are to couple them to the Neutrons inner Electron vortex. This will create a grouping of electrons along the correct spin planes simulating a magnetic atom. Both of these materials have a high nuclear spin so the Protons will be effected by both magnetic field and momentum. The key to this method will be to create the proper magnetization in the Copper horizontally, which will turn the electron orbitals into little magnets creating the 90 degree field. A second vertical magnetic field must be present slightly lower to capture the Protons as the higher momentum of the disc begins to tilt them vertical.
This method could be used by sheeting a vertically polarized magnet with Copper or Aluminum or even wrapping it with a coil as a torrid. It could also be done with only copper coils. Either way it will still have to be spun up to reach the threshold where Protons tilt vertical and Electrons stay horizontal. As this process is happening within the copper atoms, all can be started with DC currents. If it is desired to do this without spinning the disc, using only copper coils then some method of entraining the Protons with an NMR frequency may prove effective. The energy in the NMR would have to exceed the threshold of the difference of the two coils field strength. This would add a third coil pulsing the NMR frequency in the correct plane to tilt Protons towards the weaker field.
The Searl disc may be using many of these methods at different RPMs.
As we start this interaction in one small area of the device, it may be hard to envision how it can spread to envelope the entire disc, as well as effect surrounding matter. This is explained in the coupling between atoms setting next to one another as the two magnetic fields begin to increase in strength from the decoupling and from greater numbers of protons lining up in the new field. One of the methods of energy transfer between adjacent atoms is NMR, however this method is in fact frequency dependent. This means that as some of the Protons begin to tip to 90 degrees, their field in this direction becomes stronger. They will also radiate photons of the correct energy to effect nearby Protons tending to tilt them into alignment. These photons will be ignored by the Electrons which have a frequency about 1000 times higher. As new Protons get hit with NMR photons they will begin to flip into a spiral path towards reversing to 180 degrees. As they cross the new 90 degree magnetic field some will be trapped by it and begin to precess around it instead of continuing there flip. The Protons will all begin to seek the new alignment as time progresses, particularly if their NMR energy level is high overall. The Electrons will have a similar process tending to strengthen the horizontal magnetic field and holding them even tighter with the reinforced ESR energy oscillating between atoms in the plane at 90 degrees to the Proton energy. Also as the unpaired Neutron within Copper begins to split its magnetic field, the strong force will release energy, and the Electrons magnetic field will pop out aiding the polarization. As the process continues it may at some point become self sustaining, and spread beyond the 90 degree magnets of the device all through the entire system if configured correctly to allow this.
Two magnetic fields aligned at 90 degrees and building towards light speed unity. Particle velocity should speed up but never actually hit light speed, because the magnetic field is not perfectly dipole in nature. There is always some magnetic field off the sides of a dipole, however as frequency raises the tilt angles of NMR and ESR narrow, as the precession frequency raises, and far less energy will appear off the sides of the dipoles. This may push electrons into a high enough frequency to begin to radiate light. Thus the glow.
This describes a runaway condition we see in the devices studied. The better we succeed at splitting the B fields of Proton and Electron the faster the device may runaway. We can either attempt to slow the acceleration effect using very thin cylinders, or we can counter it with a method of reuniting the fields. Either way it must be accomplished within the device at the atomic layer before the device crosses the density threshold of 3rd density and vanishes.
Important to note here that it is a physics constant we may be effecting, that of Electron and Proton particle spin and relating to Planks constant. The Electron and Proton at their smallest points of spin in the Neutron may be the link to time and gravity, not so much the orbital motions. This is where we hit the wall of relativity as well as quantum physics. However since we gain control of their magnetically coupled orbital motions we have gained the ability to tilt them as well. This may be the link between the forces of EM and Gravity we have been looking for. As the Electrons momentum is less then 1/1000 the Protons this unlinking may seem of no consequence, however remember in a particle traveling at .999999... light speed this slight difference is magnified by a relativistic amount. Decoupling Electron and Proton Spin momentum may be the strongest effect we could hope for in this sense. Decoupling them inside the Neutron may effect time itself.
As the Protons motions are freed from the Electrons motions from the decoupling of the magnetic fields now setting at 90 degrees to one another, both particles would increase in frequency due to at least one countering force being decoupled. Previously when they both sat in an attracting field, their magnetic moment is alike but the angular momentum of each one is opposite in direction. In the Neutron they sit with momentum aligned and magnetic fields in a powerful opposition. As the momentum is transferred across the magnetic field this would tend to lower angular momentum of both particles. As they decouple spin increases. If time is truly the increment of spin as Wilbert Smith has suggested then the overall time frame of the atom in this split configuration will speed up, approaching or exceeding the time flow rate of free space.
Time flow rate across an area of space is linked to the vector sum of all spin rates for all particle motions [Wilbert Smith]. And this is why the entire device as well as all surrounding mater within the corona become altered as device quadrature magnetic saturation is reached. The Searl disc shows us this phenomenon manifesting in a spherical area surrounding the device. Even dislodging the dirt in the ground if it is formed within it. At the corona appears a wall where time flow changes rather quickly, and this barrier may causes a torsion force that will rip matter apart.
When the time frame reaches an equal rate as free space we could expect the effected atoms to become weightless. This is a very small change in time flow rate and observed in the blue shift seen in the GPS satellite system. If there is enough energy in the interaction to push further then we could expect the object to become gravity repulsive and a push towards the next higher density. If the density threshold is crossed and the system then shut down, we may expect it to achieve the next higher stable state of matter, naturally landing it in the 4th density as the atoms fall back into normal alignment at the next higher frequency band. At this state it becomes totally invisible to 3rd density beings.
The requirement is only that we have enough momentum of spin to tilt the Protons magnetic alignment from the stronger field into the weaker field. These two fields must cross at 90 degrees inside the atoms. If using a non magnetic substance for splitting, the 90 degree field will effect the electrons motions as well, so it must be kept as much weaker as possible, otherwise the electrons may begin to realign around it as well. It is very important to find the threshold point and no more where the Protons tilt. As the chemical bonding of these materials do not hold the magnetic field within their Electron structure. As the EM field moves into quadrature magnetism it will effect the Neutrons and begin to split them as well if encouraged with a high negative charge, effecting time and gravity.
With the cobalt magnets however, both fields could even be the same. As the orbitals are magnetic within the structure of the materials there is little chance they will demagnetize one another at the same Tesla rating. However with both fields the same it may become impossible to return them to their original state. They may tend to toggle randomly causing a chaotic condition. The best interaction will be if the momentum is used to cause the threshold switching, as then the maximum possible numbers of Protons will be under device control.
Device spin, centrifugal force, mass, [aligned angular momentum]
Vertical magnetic weaker field. NMR in the correct plane of motion.
The device spin [particle momentum I] must be calculated as to our [disc radius R] and our RPM [rotational velocity V] as an [energy value J]. It must be calculated to cross the threshold of [magnetic field coupling Bh ] in the horizontal plane and the added [energy J] must be enough to couple to the [magnetic field Bv ] in the vertical plane without crossing it. The parameters of [Disc Radius], [Disc Angular Velocity], and our two [magnetic fields Bv Bh] must be determined before we can expect a successful result.
These are the basic relationships that must be considered to arrive at a mathematical solution for initial startup.
Getting the split EM field to penetrate to the Neutron layer requires more then just splitting at the Orbital layer of the atom. Neutrons come apart naturally when removed from the Nucleus. This includes a self tilting to decouple Electron and Proton enough to expel them back into magnetic repulsion states outside one another. One of the forces involved is charge. The Nucleus must have a high positive charge near the Neutron to keep it balanced. This is a force we can effect, and it is suggested that where a high - voltage builds up on a splitting material may be where Neutrons begin changing mass to energy.
It should be understood that this effect of new atomic alignment will manifest as a total quantity of the sum of all atoms attaining the new alignments, yet at some point these fields alone become strong enough to self radiate through the material of the device. Thus a different method of control must be accessed to reverse the process or control it. As well, the startup device must reach this critical threshold.
The critical threshold will be the point where the Protons new magnetic field becomes strong enough to maintain its new alignment without the aid of our external magnets, and it begins to spread outside the domain of the magnets starting the process. There will be a minimum number of atoms involved in maintaining the 90 degree field outside the magnets inducing the effect. These atoms will be linked by the 90 degree magnetic field the sum of all atoms with electrons in alignment and the NMR energy moving between the atoms.
It becomes apparent that each material we consider using must be calculated differently. This is because the nuclear spin of all atoms is different. Some atoms do not have a nuclear magnetic field we can even couple to externally. Others have a very strong one. However it is interesting to note that even the ones that do not radiate far may look like opposing magnets setting in one alignment.
The magnetic moment of the Proton field is readily available on the NMR charts as "magnetic moment" for most all the elements. It represents a Joules/Tesla or J/T value.
Nuclear magnetic moment of only about 2% of Iron is .15696 , Copper is 2.87549, Nickel .96827 These numbers represent the magnetic field strength of the Protons magnetic force, they are different for each element and why NMR can be used to detect elements. The electron ESR is not so easy as finding it on a chart however. They must each be calculated based on the Proton field they sit within and the external magnetic field from outside the atom.
The next most important issue after discovering the start up "critical threshold" is the control mechanism. With two magnetic fields manifest through our device, and two planes of ESR / NMR exchanging energy between atoms, the only solution is to reattach the magnetic fields one atom at a time and try to control the quantity of atoms in each alignment.
One method identified by Searl is to hit the device with a 28 to 29 Mhz RF fields. This should tend to send Protons into an NMR flipping motion of a higher energy state where as they rotate or flip they cross the electron 90 degree field becoming trapped in it once again for a time. The time this can last can be over one second as NMR has a time lag. While tilted back they will no longer add to device spin.
This frequency will have to be device dependent based on the material in effect and the standing magnetic field present. It could be something as simple as two resonant coils setting vertically and horizontally with a switch to electrically couple them. It would absorb NMR from one spin plane and then transmit it into the other, causing the Proton field to tilt as NMR interactive photons are radiated in the wrong plane dispersing Proton alignments. This would only work if NMR resonance is consistent across the device strong enough to couple to one of the coils. If it is not then an external transmitter must be used only hitting the band close enough to effect NMR flips. This transmitter must be located within the system such that it does not loose the time frame of the device. So control may become a balance of controlling the NMR energy between the two polarized planes within the device. Note this system is separate from the startup system, which can not be expected to control the process once started.
In the selection of materials it is noteworthy to identify a few very basic qualities of the atoms we are working with and attempt to correlate the parameters to accomplish a method of engineering devices, down to magnetic force splitting into the Neutrons.
Iron: The magnetic field in iron is mostly in its Electron layer. Of course the weight of iron is mostly setting in its Nuclear center which has a neutral magnetic field. When coupling a magnetic field through Iron almost none of the atoms weight or mass is effected in the least, [2% natural abundance]. As iron is magnetized, its chemical bonding connections are seen to roll with the external magnetic field setting up a new angle with other magnetic domains around it. The resistance to this force is linked only to the electron mass which is some 1800 times lower then its Nuclear mass, and its resistance to chemical bonding roll, and the temperature. A magnetic field generated from flowing current through Iron wire would be seen to have only an Electron generated field.
Copper: The magnetic field in copper is setting only in its Nucleus, attached to its weight or mass tightly, and able to roll if acted on by an outside magnetic field. Coppers electron shell is magnetically neutral. A magnetic field moving through copper is seen to couple to its "mass" and the Proton generated magnetic field will have to tilt the atoms weight as it changes angles. There will be a delay because of momentum during the tilting process as the weight will resist altering its spin angle. A magnetic field generated from flowing current through Copper wire would be seen to have both an Electron and a Proton generated field.
Aluminum: In Aluminum the Electron shell is also neutral, however it's Nuclear magnetic moment is higher then Copper. Although the mass of Aluminum is lower then copper the magnetic coupling is higher.
Silver: I added Silver here because it has almost as low a Nuclear spin as Iron. With Silver wire one can generate almost completely Electron generated fields. Due to the fact that Silver is a better conductor then copper, these qualities make it perfect for the ideal splitting device if one needs magnetic coils creating magnetic fields with almost no mass interactions.
Cobalt: In Cobalt we see that both electron layer and Nucleus have a magnetic field inherent within them. An external magnetic field moving through cobalt will effect both. The electron shell is tightly bonded, so if tilting the Nucleus with a stronger magnetic field, it should decouple from the electron shell.
Effects: Effects that can be used to alter the free floating Nuclear Mass motions of materials are not limited to magnetism, or electric potential. Even though if you shake a block of copper atoms, it is the electromagnetic forces that keep the Nucleus centered and spinning, this force allows a flexibility to appear between the Proton and Electron shell. The Electron shell is extremely light by comparison to the Nucleus of an atom, but in solids the Electron shell is anchored into the structure bonds and its mass is far greater then one Nucleus. The Nuclear mass can be vibrated using many forms of energy.
Sound
Physical vibration
Moving magnetic field
A Vibrating voltage [Capacitance coupling]
Gravity
It should be noted that where the Electron Mass of a material comes into natural harmonic ratios with the Nuclear mass, a coupling of vibrational energy may be possible, if the material is suspended in a magnetic field and free to vibrate. [See section on Hamel Cones]
Quadrature magnetization:If we wanted to produce a quadrature magnetization with the least amount of effort, it would seem the best material would be one known to have both a magnetized Electron shell, as well as a high nuclear spin to begin with. Of the three basic magnetic metals, Iron, Nickel, and Cobalt, Cobalt jumps out as the perfect candidate. We would expect that Cobalt would be the easiest material to create the effect in, as it naturally has both Proton and Electron magnetization. This is providing we can achieve a controlled separation of the two and align it to effect the Neutrons.
Moving towards metals that are non magnetic at the electron layer, we are now faced with causing them to become magnetized or placing them beside Electron magnetized materials like iron. The metals Copper and Aluminum jump out here as they are electric conductors and can be magnetized simply by passing current through them. If the current is passed vertically then a natural spin would manifest in the correct plane to align properly with our vertical magnetic field. The current would tend to tilt the electron fields exactly where we want them. We would still need the correct device spin to hold the Proton orbitals vertical, however now we have a device that may not need its 90 degree magnets at all. Simply wrap a magnetic cylinder with copper as a toroidal coil. Cylinder is magnetized N/S vertical, the same direction we flow current through the wires. The Proton tilts should manifest within the copper wire. This explains a great many devices at this point, combining magnets and copper wire in such a method. Now we may find some ability to define the correct parameters.
[For reference here are a few elements]
Specific gravity 7.87 [mass/volume]
Isotope 57
Symbol Fe
Name Iron
Spin 1/2
Natural Abund. 2.11900
Magnetic Moment 0.15696
Gamma (x 10^7rad/Ts) 0.86806
Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 ---
Frequency 1.379 Mhz
Reference Fe(CO)5
Iron is a natural material to use to place a magnetic field next to another material, however it will not be very useful as to splitting the magnetic fields . We see its natural abundance at 2%, this means we will get erratic results if any, as only 2% of its nuclear magnetic fields can be coupled to consistently with RF. There will be a very low amount of NMR jumping between atoms. Irons Nucleus would be impossible to align to a weaker field crossing at 90 degrees to its Electron field, and only device spin could do this. Iron would be best thought of as a magnetic conductor able to distribute the magnetic field in a constant manner along a better substance for doing the splitting.
Specific gravity 8.95
Isotope 63
Symbol Cu
Name Copper
Spin 3/2
Natural Abund. 69.17000
% Receptivity (rel. to 13C) 0.06500
Magnetic Moment 2.87549
Gamma(x 10^7rad/Ts) 7.11179
Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 -22.00000
Frequency 11.290
Reference [Cu(CH3CN)4][ClO4]
Here we see copper is a better choice for splitting the fields. It's natural abundance falls into two different levels on the NMR chart. The most commonly found Isotope of copper is at 69% abundance [listed above]. It's next is found at 30% where we see a slightly higher NMR frequency. This means if we have a cylinder of copper built it may have one or probably both Isotopes found in varying degrees with two NMR frequencies present. Although copper is a good choice it is still a gamble and two sets of numbers will have to be followed assuming we will fall somewhere between them both. Copper is an excellent choice for coupling torsion from a magnetic field but may not be the best choice for splitting the magnetic fields consistently. Yet with a magnetic moment half that of Aluminum and a greater mass it may be far easier to accomplish with a wider force window. As copper is non magnetic at the electron layer, unless current is flowing through it, some form of current conduction will be necessary, or setting it very close to a magnetic material, to generate the horizontal field Bh [horizontal] . Current may have to constantly flow vertically through the material to magnetize it.
[The Searl disk is an example of the two Iron and Copper touching in a cylindrical method so as to make use of both]
Specific gravity 2.7
Isotope 27
Symbol Al
Name Aluminum
Spin 5/2
Natural Abund. % 100.00000
Receptivity(rel. to 13C) 0.20700
Magnetic Moment 4.30869
Gamma(x 10^7rad/Ts) 6.97627
Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 14.66000
Frequency 11.095 Mhz
Reference Al(NO3)3
Aluminum has a natural abundance of 100 %. This means that we will get very consistent results across all the atoms of Aluminum as found in nature. Its nuclear magnetic moment is very high 4.3 making it easy to couple to the Protons magnetic field yet a little harder to tilt it. In a one Tesla field we can expect NMR to be operating around 11 Mhz consistently across all the atoms. Due to the high magnetic moment of Aluminum, we may run into a problem with RPM and the force window will be narrower. We will have to spin the disc around 2 times faster then a copper disc to break free of the horizontal field Bh. Another interesting note is that Copper and Aluminum lay very close to the same NMR frequency. Aluminum is not magnetic so it will be necessary to flow current through it to create field Bh if desired. It may also be necessary to support this field with 90 degree magnets because Aluminum is a poor conductor and creating a strong enough field to align Protons may be impossible without some external help.
Specific gravity: 8.9
Isotope 59
Symbol Co
Name Cobalt
Spin 7/2
Natural Abund. % 100.00000
Receptivity(rel. to 13C) 0.27800
MagneticMoment 5.24700
Gamma(x 10^7rad/Ts) 6.33200
Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 42.00000
Frequency 10.103
Reference K3[Co(CN)6]
Amazingly cobalt seems to offer all the needed parameters . 100% abundance, high weight, high magnetic moment, plus it is paramagnetic, magnetized along the electron shell as well as at the nucleus. With this material we could be certain that both magnetic fields are present and can be coupled to for splitting the fields. Cobalt magnets run between 0.8 T to 1.1 T and should work for NMR Proton tilting easily. A cylinder rich in cobalt would need nothing more then to be magnetized horizontally Bh, and have opposing magnets at the correct Tesla rating Bv. There would be no need to have electric flow induced prior to tilting the Proton field. The entire disc could reach total saturation in both planes of quadrature magnetization. Two magnets of slightly different strength one as Bh and one as Bv a little weaker could be glued together or on opposite sides of a thin cylinder and spinning may be all that is needed to split the fields. Rows of these could be arranged around a cylinder of sphere, truly the simplest method I have found as of yet. Charging the Horizontal magnet with a negative HV would encourage a Neutron split.
As to how disc size will effect the process lets consider a simple formula for angular momentum
L = MVR
Particle Angular momentum = [Mass] times [Velocity] times [Radius]
This may represent the momentum imparted to a Proton or Electron setting within our disc.
We see that as we increase [Mass] [Velocity] or [Radius] we get a multiplying effect of the other two on the angular momentum . Increasing the disc radius can increase the effects of momentum on the outer layer of the disc by several magnitudes. We have no control over the mass of a Proton [1.6726231·10-27 kg]. We can however effect both the [Velocity] or RPM and the [Radius] of our disc. The suggestion in this formula is not to build our spinning disc too small, rather as large as practical. As the angular momentum of our disc will be coupled into the Protons angular momentum when they are sitting in alignment within a magnetic field, the higher we go the better. This is a coupling of angular momentum, and is not a coupling of magnetic spin frequency per say. Whatever momentum we are able to add will tend to spread our force window wider as Protons will be effected 1836 times more then Electrons. The difference must exceed the magnetic bond between Proton and Electron magnetic fields as well as the Electrons momentum alone.
Ref http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html [Angular momentum of a particle]
Further if we consider the moment of inertia and apply it to a rigid spinning object [this is for reference and probably will not apply to just our particle]
I = mr ^2
Moment of inertia [I] = mass times the radius squared
L = I x w
Angular momentum [rigid object] = Moment of Inertia times Angular Velocity
From these two formulas we see a similar multiplying effect of [Velocity] [Radius squared]
Ref http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html [Angular momentum] [Moment of Inertia]
It is noteworthy that doubling the radius of our disc should increase the angular momentum by a factor of around 4, reducing the RPM necessary by the same factor.
The larger the disc and the higher the RPM the wider the "force window" to reach critical threshold. Further to decrease the disc radius will require our 90 degree magnets to more precisely find the exact window where Electrons tilt and Protons do not tilt.
It may now become evident that what Hutchisen may have found was a method of entraining both Proton and Electron frequencies, and tilting them towards 90 degree positions, using the correct frequencies crossing such that sums and differences matched NMR and ESR rates in different quadrature planes. He did send objects into another density, which completely vanished, as well as levitate objects. The other possibility is to push both into higher rates of angular momentum by applying aiding spin forces to both simultaneously, this would seem all but impossible without first decoupling the two magnetic forces to some extent.
The Sweet VTA takes on a new outlook as well. Aligning the Protons in a weak magnetic field. It would take only a small force at the correct frequency to tilt the Protons into two canceling positions while entraining the electrons to flip the full 180 degrees. We end up extracting the electrons accelerating energy, while neutralizing the Protons energy. The reverse momentum of electron would be seen as the cold electric energy, in this model. As with normal electric flows, electrons are always flowing within the atomic orbits of atoms where greater opposing momentum constantly counters them. Also noteworthy that the actual splitting may be happening within the copper wire rather then within the magnet. The coils do not make any sense whatsoever as to turns to voltage ratios. The correct 4 coils set up with proper alignment may be all that is necessary, magnet conditioning may be merely setting up the NMR or ESR frequencies to split the field in the copper atoms of the coils. The quadrature polarization may be working its way even down the wires to the load. This would require the electron current to be moving parallel with the magnetic field rather then at 90 degrees to it. This energy would be delivering two magnetic fields rather then one.
In the plasmas we seem to see an energy gain, where electrons are completely freed from atomic orbits for a time in the ionized path through the air.
In my current model, the two step process for tunning a Hamel cone would be these:
1 - Achieve the highest possible cone vibration resonance frequency through good design choices. [get the cones to vibrate]
2 - Split the magnetic fields by finding the resonant subharmonics that land the NMR frequency closer to the horizontal magnets.
The force window can be seen as getting the first NMR resonance to manifest on a cone latitude as close to the correct magnetic field area as near the magnets as possible. The vertical tilting force on the Protons, and the NMR coupling frequency latitude of cone mass to NMR frequency, must cross at the correct horizontal magnet strength to form a splitting area. If the two never come close enough then a cone that simply vibrates may never cross the threshold of splitting the fields and releasing Neutron energy. Getting the cones to vibrate is only the first step, this creates the vertical momentum force for Proton alignment. They must resonate an NMR subharmonic, with a mass physical vibration, crossing the magnetic field at the proper intensity to create the split of Proton and Electron magnetic fields along one latitude, before it can spread. It would seem that strength and placement of the base and upper magnets may help support the vertical field, and more attention should be directed here as well. Being able to regulate the gating magnets strength may allow a sliding of the NMR ring latitude slightly up or down the cone to coincide with the proper distance from the horizontal magnets to begin the splitting process.
If the electron mass of the free floating cone can be vibrationally coupled to the vibrational rate of the nucleus at a subharmonic then nuclear Resonance should envelope the cones upper and lower areas where circles are widest. If we could build a cone such that its electron mass was equal to the mass of one nucleus this would vibrate up rather quickly. This small cone would have only around 3,813 atoms total and its total electron mass would be equal to the mass of one Nucleus. Having identical weight it would easily vibrate at the exact rate of the Nucleus and begin to couple the Nucleus vibrations between atoms. Growing larger requires a sub harmonically coupled vibrational rate. Lowering the magnetic field will help because it will lower the nucleus precession rate. This will not effect the coupling mass but it will allow for vibrating a heavier object more quickly at a lower harmonic.
These parameters are within our means to measure and to easily alter as well as to control. The Hamel cone is tunned through a laborious process of adjusting the opposing magnets floating distance, altering the stress holding the mass of the cone, thus its vibrational rate. However if the cone has not been, by chance, engineered to fall within a certain range, then no vibrations will surface. It would seem the cone in the center is the one that will emulate the atom most closely, as it circles both top and bottom.
The NMR frequency can be determined mathematically for Aluminum for the magnets used and the distance they are at from the Aluminum, dropping off at an inverse distance cubed rate. Two devices can be fabricated to measure both vibrational mass rate, and NMR rate.
Mass vibration sensor:
A section of the cone is polished to shiny. A laser light pen is connected to the frame and hits the cone reflecting off onto a calibrated piece of white paper, with a grid pattern and a photo sensor behind it with a small hole. Cone vibration is seen as a dot size increase, or a line width. If the paper is moved further away this will be amplified. A simple circuit can connect to a frequency counter that should read the frequency of vibration.
NMR sensor:
A coil is wound around the frame, outside the cone of about 30 meters of wire horizontally level. The length of this wire could be near the calculated NMR frequency wavelength. This could be wound on a separate form that may be removed. A second coil is placed inside the cone with vertical polarization as an NMR receiver. It must be near the center of the cone and have a shield around only its outer edge, not its side edges. It can be fitted with a tunning capacitor and set to resonate at the NMR frequency as well. A strong signal generator can now be used to scan the cones resonance. When the NMR frequency is stumbled on a simple RF field strength meter should show the cross coupling between the two coils as a sharp resonant peak, or a group of them appearing along the cone. This can be achieved with a diode and a voltmeter much like Hutchisens hand held unit. The positioning of this coil must be very accurately vertical and the connecting wires must be very short and shielded running to the meter that must have a shielded box. Or a radio receiver could be tuned using a CW receiver, and following the signal generators frequency.
As the cone is frequency scanned in this manner the vibrational rates of both "device resonance" and "nuclear resonance" should show on one of our sensors. Finding the rates and then altering parameters to tune them to cross at one frequency harmonic is the method for tuning in step one. A fully tuned magnetically floating cone may physically vibrate when the correct NMR frequency hits it, indicating that the cones electron mass has linked to the NMR vibrational rate. It should be determined how many frequencies this can be made to happen at, and how high we can run this frequency up.
Concept of operation:
4 coils are provided for individual control of Proton and Electron motions. Device is designed to find the correct parameters by allowing a large number of variables to be applied. The DC coils are outside the NMR coils so they will not interfere with the high frequencies hitting the sphere. No iron is to be used in the device, because the individual magnetic fields will be skewed or bent as they pass through iron. All the magnetic fields must converge in tact inside the Aluminum sphere. The outer DC coils fields will pass through the NMR coils because they are not Alternating fields, and will receive no inductance as they pass through them. However the DC coils will attenuate some RF from the NMR coils.In the Nuclear
Magnetic Resonant Battery or NMR Battery pulses
are fed through a Copper tube or cylinder vertically. This creates a
magnetic field pulsing around the inside of the tube at 90 degrees and
causes the Protons to move into a magnetic spin, still precessing
around the vertical magnetic field, but at 90 degrees to it. Because
the Copper tube completely wraps the Aluminum tube all the Protons are
effected at once and the device does not have to physically spin. When
the Aluminum reaches Nuclear resonance at the full 90 degrees the
fields split into the Neutrons. Noncancelling EM begins to appear along
the surfaces of the Aluminum top and bottom [one voltage polarity] and
sides [other voltage polarity]. The device is totally
controlled electronically by the pulse amplitude and pulse length. If
the pulses stop then the Protons slowly spiral back up into alignment
with the vertical magnetic field and it should shut down.
Public Domain Paper 03-15-06
Note 1
In AG work it is common to use values relevant to a 1 Tesla magnetic field, as many Neo magnets land between 1 and 1.5 Tesla. It is noteworthy to mention however that the precession rates [NMR and ESR frequencies] given in this paper are relative to 1 Tesla and these rates will be altered as the field is lowered or raised.
Note 2
It is also well know now that the particles Proton and Electron are not really particles, but energy in a wave looping function. However as they still possess the same measurable effects of magnetic moment and angular momentum, I have chosen to use the word particle to describe them.
Note 3
A mental image presented of the Roshin and Godin Russian Searl disc duplication may be an aid to understanding references in this paper, as well as a basic understanding of how NMR and ESR function.
http://www.cis.rit.edu/htbooks/mri/inside.htm
http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm
Other References:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magpot.html#c1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magmom.html#c2
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/nmr.html#c1
Spin Plane - As an electron is seen in an orbit around the nucleus, any one complete circle lies within a single plane, or plane of motion. As the magnetic vector lies at 90 degrees to this it is important to have some way to reference the angle. This is similar to an electric coil, whose winding all lie approximately within one plane, and the magnetic field generated lies at 90 degrees to this plane. While the Electron eventually winds its way around the entire electron shell, its spin plane shifts, however if the atom is magnetic more of these spin planes align to form a greater field external to the atom along one spin plane. The electric spin plane is seen 90 degrees to the magnetic field and tends to contain more electron motion of one direction of spin.
EM - Electro magnetic force is 1/137 as strong as the strong force. EM is the force operating at the Electron layer, and between Protons and Electrons.
Strong Force - The force found at the nucleus of atoms where vortexes or particles are very close to one another. The Neutron is seen as an Electron vortex overlapping a Proton vortex such that spin is coupled and EM is canceled. In this tight configuration the strong force is dominant. It drops off just outside the nucleus and does not effect the Electron cloud. Strong force can only hold 83 Protons in a stable configuration. Bismuth is the largest stable atom.Within the strong force is a weight reduction where the total mass is lighter then the sum of its parts.
Nuclear - With reference to the unit at the center of an atom consisting of Protons and Neutrons which are tightly bound by the strong force. The major weight of the atom exists within this nucleus. The Electron shell is seen to exist outside the influence of the strong force, and operates only by electro magnetic force.Proton - The Proton is seen generating the major magnetic force found in the nucleus of the atom, thus it is the coupling link between the atoms major mass and magnetism for atoms that do have a nuclear magnetic moment. Tilting the external magnetic field that is coupled to a Proton tilts its spinning mass rotation offering a resistance of momentum. The Proton is seen to spin the same direction of its orbital motion and as such offers a higher energy output then Electrons when magnetism and momentum are combined. Particle that spins CCW in a magnetic field, bound in the strong force at the nucleus of atoms.
Nucleon - A paired Proton and Neutttttrroon found in the Nucleus of an atom
Neutron - The combined Electron Proton vortexes that cancel their Electro Magnetic fields, and are bound in the nucleus by the strong force.Electron - While described as a particle, the electron is really a quantum wave energy moving between densities. It is only in our density at very specific intervals of time or quantums where its force is felt like the spokes on a wheel as it spins. The importance is that we have identified its main measurable manifestations. That of magnetism, electricity, and radiation frequency as related to "angular momentum" and "magnetic moment." The electron spins opposite its magnetic moment. Electrons create a magnetic field some 600 times stronger then Protons with a mass over 1800 times lower.Particle that spins CW in a magnetic field, freely roaming the electron cloud and is not bound by the strong force.
Quadrature - Forces that are linked together in a 90 degree relationship such that energy between angles of forces are linked. The electron set into motion creates a quadrature magnetic field. The Electrons spin on the quantum level partially creates the time flow rate [Wilbert Smith].
Quadrature magnetization - The theoretical state within an atom where Protons precess around one magnetic field, and Electrons precess around another magnetic field, such that both magnetic fields sit at 90 degrees to one another. Both fields sit in the blotch wall of the other. This may be a necessary transitional configuration to the creation of Neutrons, where both are seen to end up overlapping.
Density - A stable state of matter, one set of parameters where the atom is stable to interact with other matter at the same state.Our physical world is one such possible state, where atomic particles have found an equilibrium. The sages through the ages have envisioned many more such worlds and named them. They indicate we are now on the 3rd leveled density of mater. Claimed Alien contact as well has suggested this model is accurate and moving into higher densities changes the relationships of momentum, gravity, and time flow rate.
Source - The sought after place where free energy is moving into this density and powering the atoms and all manifestations of energy found here. The regenerative source, or the root location of tapping that source of energy. I believe that Source will be located within matter, and is found at the crossing point of atomic particles entering and leaving this density.
Dipole - The quality of magnetic fields as they are created from electron motion to manifest two directions of force along its B vector. One labeled North and one labeled South. The earth has a magnetic South pole setting at its North Geomagnetic pole. The North pole of a compass, will attract to a South magnetic pole of a free magnet.
Blotch wall - The center point between the dipole ends of a magnet where almost no magnetic field exists with enough magnetic polarity to effect anything. Holding one magnet inside the blotch wall of another allows for the least interaction between them. Within atomic orbits that are more perfectly aligned spherically, this effect may lead to another stable state of atoms, once supporting magnetic fields are established.
Compass - The simplest most convenient way to detect a magnetic field, although often overlooked today as a tool of science. Caution is in order because if held too close to a Neo magnet may be completely reverse polarized if forced into a reverse field alignment. If using a compass it should be periodically checked against the earths field and realigned as needed using a neo magnet.
Proton mass energy equivalent: 1.503 277 43 x 10 -10 J 938.272 029 MeV
Electron mass energy equivalent: 8.187 x 10 -14 J 0.510998 MeV [Me C^2]
Proton mass: 1.672621 x 10 -27 kg
Electron Mass: 9.109 38 x 10 ^ -31 kg 5.485 x 10 ^-4 u
Mass ratio Electron / Proton: 5.446 170 x 10 ^ -4
Mass ratio Proton / Electron: 1836.152
Proton g-Factor: 5.585
Proton magnetic moment: 1.41060671 x 10^-26 J T^-1
Proton gyromagnetic ratio: 2.675 x 10 ^8 s^-1 T^-1 over 2pi = 42.5774813 Mhz/ T^-1
Electron magnetic moment: -9.2847647043 x 10 ^ -24 J T^-1
Electron volt-joule relationship 1.602 x 10 ^-19 J 5.609 x 10^35 eV = (1 Kg)C^2
Joule-electron volt relationship: 6.241 x 10 ^18 eV = 1J
Proton Electron ratio: Ue / Up = 658.2106881
Electron magnetic moment: -9.2847647043·10-24 J T^-1
Proton magnetic moment: 1.41060671·10-26J T^-1
Energy of a photon E = h V [h = 6.626x10^-34 J [Planks constant]] [V = frequency]
Gyromagnetic ratio V = Y B [Y = V / B] [V = frequency [Hz]] [B = magnetic field strength [Tesla]] [Y = gyromagnetic ratio]
Transition energy E = h Y B [h = 6.626 x 10 ^-34] [Y = gyromagnetic ratio] [B = magnetic field strength] [V is between 15 and 800 Mhz typically in medical apparatus]
Ionization potential for an organic molecule is 6 x 10 ^ -19 J
In NMR the energy in a photon is a function of its frequency times planks constant. For the photon to flip a nucleus magnetic field over this must equal the Transition energy. There is only one B field strength that can match any particular photon. Atoms setting all in the same magnetic field will easily exchange photons.